Making diet and fitness fun and easy

Why Low to Moderate Intensity Training is not more effective for fat loss

In a recent question on Quora a user asked “Is it better to do intervals or steady jogging for fat burning?” I originally answered the question without doing any research and just commented on my personal experience, and mentioned diet is more important for fat loss than exercise.  Recently another user submitted an answer that “your body’s first choice is to burn the fuel it has in greater supply – the fat” Now I knew this was not completely true and had recently been reading some old physiology text books so I commented off the top of my head, but I was wrong as well.

So what is the real answer?  The fuel choices that the body uses are determined on how quickly they are needed.  This is the difference between aerobic (with oxygen) and anaerobic (without oxygen) as many of you probably already know.  When the energy requirement has enough time to get oxygen to the cells where energy is created, more free fatty acids (FFAs) can be used for fuel.  The break down (catabolism) of fat (lipids) to FFAs is a complex process and takes longer than using glucose as a fuel source.  The highest ratio of FFAs to Carbohydrates (CHO) as a fuel source is when resting which uses about 60-80% FFAs and 40-20% CHO (this varies depending on the source that you read, see references here here and here).

This info means a few different things.  Firstly to burn the most fat possible you want your basal metabolic rate (BMR) to be as high as possible.  Also your fat to carb fuel ratio will be more fat at low to moderate intensity training (LMIT).  What this doesn’t mean is that you will burn more fat in total with lower intesity exercise.

To explain further I will reference a recent research paper by Mark J. Smith, Ph.D. that you can find here.  To simplify the explanation although during the training period the majority or all of the fuel used will be CHO, the recovery period after training will burn primarily fat when doing HIIT.  A quote from Smith

” I equate it to borrowing money from the bank – one has to pay it back and an increase in oxygen consumption above normal resting levels is needed to do so. When it comes to replenishing the energy stores of the body, it makes sense that if one were to predominantly burn glycogen as a fuel during a work out (a HIIT work out would accomplish this), the body would need to put back those glycogen stores to be ready for a subsequent similar activity. Consequently, it would further make sense for the body to utilize fat while it is accomplishing the glycogen “top‐up.”This is exactly what happens and, in a similar fashion, when the body burns predominantly fat during a work out (a LMICT work out would accomplish this, but with a low total caloric expenditure), the body replenishes the fat while burning glycogen during the recovery. Because EPOC can often last longer than the actual work out time, one would want to be utilizing fat as the fuel of choice during this period to stay lean; SIT and HIIT accomplishes this very well.”

In that paper Smith cites multiple studies that have shown HIIT impacts fat loss greater than LMIT.  These studies can be found here:

Although fat loss is the primary topic of this post there are many other benefits to HIIT.  Tabata style HIIT has been proven to increases V02 max and overall cardio vascular efficiency.  HIIT with resistance (weights, bands, bodyweight) will increase muscle mass, which will also contribute to fat loss.

If you have any corrections or a contradicting opinion I would love to hear it in the comments.


For some reason I forgot to post the most important part of an article, the counter point.  I am not sure how I missed this but Lyle McDonald has a great post with some good counter points her


Comments on: "High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Affects on Fat Loss" (6)

  1. Is it better to do intervals or steady jogging for fat burning?…

    Hey Justin, thanks for adding that comment. I made my comment off the top of my head and didn’t do my research. This led me to break out some old text books and do some googleing. I found and article that discusses this exact topic here http://physiqu

  2. Is it better to do intervals or steady jogging for fat burning?…

    MY REVISED ANSWER: While the ratio of fat to carbs calories used during interval training is less, total calories of fat is more. But the big thing is that for ~3 hours after interval training during the recovery state, way more fat is used for fuel wh…

  3. Which is more effective for fat loss – 20 minutes of high intensity interval training or 60 minutes of cardio in the fat burning zone?…

    Yo Nate and commenters. I did some research on this and there is actual studies done that proves HIIT is better for fat loss than low intensity. I summarized it on my blog here

  4. Which is more effective for fat loss – 20 minutes of high intensity interval training or 60 minutes of cardio in the fat burning zone?…

    While I do agree with everything that Nate says I don’t think he answers the question that directly. I did some research and found that there have been actual studies that prove HIIT training does burn more fat than low intensity training. I summarize…

  5. […] High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Affects on Fat Loss | My … […]

  6. Luke (Four Hour Body Couple) said:

    Really nice discussion, Justin. Thanks for bringing this to light with excellent references, and a clear explanation. A diagram came to mind as I was reading, from Mark Rippertoe’s excellent ‘Starting Strength’. Page 296 in the 2nd edition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: